After
reading both online articles, I find things from both that will help me in my
first paper. One narrative describes a lifelong process of learning, while the
other describes a shorter, more isolated experience in one’s life.
The first
narrative, by Feross, gave enough background information on his interest in
computer programming. He clearly explained both the reasoning for his interest
in it, and how he worked his way up from the bottom starting at a young age. I
know nothing about the subject but felt like I understood his learning process
and was able to see how he came so far. He repeated what he felt was the most
significant information, “practice makes perfect”.
The second
narrative about living Google free seemed impossible at first, when we are so
very absorbed in Google as a search engine alone. He provided us with a short
history of Google and how Google has advanced over the years. Step by step he explains how he retrieved his
data and was able to slowly remove Google from his life.
Both narratives provided great detail to help
the reader to understand exactly what they did. In a sense, “convinced us of their truth” like
we are to do in our own narrative, leaving the reader feeling like they were
there. I left feeling like I knew what they went through. I will use these both
in my own work by weeding out the details that stray the reader away from the
experience I am trying to share with them. I will include details that are
specific to my experience, describing what I learned and how I learned it.
Excellent observations!
ReplyDeleteI love the sentence "I left feeling like I knew what they went through." I need to apply this to my own paper. Thank you.
ReplyDelete